Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes:
> - For many of these files, it would be actively harmful to use
> architecture-qualified filenames. Manpages included in -dev packages
> should not change names based on the architecture; having
> /usr/share/pam-config contain multiple files for the same profile, one
> for each architecture of the package that's installed, would not work
> correctly; etc.
Appropos pam config. Shouldn't that be arch-qualified (which includes
/etc)?
Say I have pam modules for ldap installed for amd64 but not for armel?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ty30qiwm.fsf@frosties.localnet
