Le Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:38:29AM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > I think the concern that people have here (and I'm not sure yet whether it > is enough of a concern to warrant creating more administration) is that > the DEP driver is almost certainly going to have a vested interest in the > DEP reaching consensus (otherwise they wouldn't have volunteered to drive > it in the first place), and therefore isn't a great choice for an > impartial judge of consensus if there's some dispute.
Hi Russ, judging by the current status list DEPs, the problem is more stalling than accepting them too early. I admit that as DEP admins, we have not done a good job at pinging DEP drivers. Because of the current confusion of roles on DEP 5, that I push as a driver, I am waiting for its completion before pinging other DEPs as admin. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120120005811.ga28...@merveille.plessy.net
