> Hi, > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html > > Hum, it looks like some ftpmaster added a new entry in the FAQ (since it's > dated October 2011). Probably Mike O'Connor since he replied to #646729 > and re-raised its severity. > > Mike, it would be still nice to have some official answer to > <20111027070837.gm...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com>. At least so that the > reasoning of the FTP masters is recorded for posterity. > > I'm not going to argue further since it looks like the consensus seems to > be to enforce this requirement for this specific case. > > It would still be nice if ftpmasters mailed debian-devel when they > extend their FAQ to rule on new kinds of issues. >
Raphael, It wasn't I who edited the FAQ, nor am I an ftpmaster. I don't believe that this FAQ entry was made in order to make a rule on a new kind of issue. I think it is to clarify a misconception that seems to be becoming more common about "what is the source code". I don't belive that this stance we are taking about what constitutes source code is at all a new one. stew
pgpADfk4cJqTE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
