On Oct 13, Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> wrote: > Isn't this what the whole thread is about: ignoring other people's use > cases? I do not know what it is for you. For me, it is about understanding the impact on Debian of implementing this. I have received interesting replies which address valid issues, like the need for a significantly bigger initramfs (which so far is not clear), but also a lot of handwaving and "I like to do this my way" replies. Everything we do has merits and downsides, our goal should be to find the best possible compromise.
(BTW: vorlon, I have a bit of embedded experience and own multiple ARM systems...) > It seems it's one of the only reasons why RedHat people are > pushing to not separate /usr (udev, systemd) and getting rid of /sbin, > /bin, /lib (also a nice reason to push use of dracut). Less use cases is > easier to commercially support I guess. If you have not noticed, with SuSE close to death Red Hat has become the upstream maintainer for quite a lot of infrastructure. If you are concerned about them steering Linux in directions not discussed with the rest of the community, and I am, then I suggest that you start looking hard at systemd, which plans much bigger changes than this one. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
