Le Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:06:11PM +0000, Philipp Kern a écrit : > On 2011-08-23, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote: > > It seems strange to include a non-CA certificate in ca-certificates; we > > may need a different sort of infrastructure to handle things like this. > > (And I think it would be a bit questionable to trust any certificate > > signed by that certificate in a web browser, say, which is what would > > happen if it were just included in ca-certificates.) > > Yep, it's the wrong place. Furthermore, if we are not allowed to distribute > it, we shouldn't. And if other open-source projects don't ship it, that's > fairly good clue that we shouldn't, neither.
Thanks everybody who explained better the usage of this certificate. As others, I now think that a good place for it would be in a future cloud support package, for instance cloud-utils (http://bugs.debian.org/622946). There is no indication that the certificate is not redistributable, and there is at least one other project that redistributes it (Ubuntu, in the euca2ools package). Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110825020535.gc30...@merveille.plessy.net
