On 2011-08-23, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote: > It seems strange to include a non-CA certificate in ca-certificates; we > may need a different sort of infrastructure to handle things like this. > (And I think it would be a bit questionable to trust any certificate > signed by that certificate in a web browser, say, which is what would > happen if it were just included in ca-certificates.)
Yep, it's the wrong place. Furthermore, if we are not allowed to distribute it, we shouldn't. And if other open-source projects don't ship it, that's fairly good clue that we shouldn't, neither. (You possibly might be able to offer a downloader in contrib.) Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnj5a4r3.eba.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
