Package: python-m2crypto Severity: serious > > That may take a little more time, as I noted that demo/x509/proxylib.py is not > free: > > ############################################################################ > # Matt Rodriguez, LBNL > #Copyright (c) 2003, The Regents of the University of California, > #through Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > #(subject to receipt of any required approvals from the U.S. Dept. of > Energy). > #All rights reserved. > ############################################################################ > > Of course, this file is not used at build time and is not distributed in our > binary packages, but if I understand well our procedures, I can not knowingly > upload a package that contains this file. > > Hence the question to the other developers: is it necessary to correct > m2crypto > source package in Stable ? Not that I am interested to do it – you know my > position on these files is that they should be documented but ignored > otherwise > (see http://lists.debian.org/20100124144741.gd13...@kunpuu.plessy.org ). So > if the answer is yes, can somebody volunteer to do the work ? > > Have a nice day, > > -- > Charles Plessy > Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan > >
It's certainly necessary for us to not distribute stuff which is not distributable. I'm therefore BCCing sub...@bugs.debian.org, as this should be a separate bug from the wishlist bug this is currently attached to. stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ei0tigm9....@tang.vireo.org
