Le Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:37:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 11:58:48PM +0100, Dima Barsky a écrit :
> > 
> > Sorry for the delay, I was away for a while. I have to admit, I have not 
> > paid
> > much attention to m2crypto lately, so if you or anybody else wants to pick 
> > it
> > up I would not mind at all. If there are no volunteers I'll have a look at 
> > the
> > bug reports and upload a new version in the next week or two.
> 
> Hi Dima,
> 
> thanks for the answer !  I will go ahead with the upload soon.

That may take a little more time, as I noted that demo/x509/proxylib.py is not
free:

  ############################################################################
  # Matt Rodriguez, LBNL
  #Copyright (c) 2003, The Regents of the University of California,
  #through Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  #(subject to receipt of any required approvals from the U.S. Dept. of Energy).
  #All rights reserved.
  ############################################################################

Of course, this file is not used at build time and is not distributed in our
binary packages, but if I understand well our procedures, I can not knowingly
upload a package that contains this file.

Hence the question to the other developers: is it necessary to correct m2crypto
source package in Stable ?  Not that I am interested to do it – you know my
position on these files is that they should be documented but ignored otherwise
(see http://lists.debian.org/20100124144741.gd13...@kunpuu.plessy.org ).  So
if the answer is yes, can somebody volunteer to do the work ?

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810000031.gb8...@merveille.plessy.net

Reply via email to