On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@pps.jussieu.fr> wrote: >> From what I've seen in Lennart's posts, adding systemd support doesn't >> seem to be too complicated. > > No. No changes at all are necessary to be compatible with systemd. > This is a very impressive feature of systemd; at the same time, this is > what complicates systemd, and creates a dependency on cgroups.
I was referring to socket activation. > Is that cool? Is that bloat? I say yes to both. I'd rather avoid the word "bloat" in this discussion, as it's very often misused. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canvyna_xwfhvt90p0myk5c-6p4on0oo_vuzjul30n4hkeek...@mail.gmail.com
