On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Fernando Lemos <fernando...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Guus Sliepen <g...@debian.org> wrote: >> By the way, we already have the SysV init scripts, so we don't need to do >> anything to keep supporting that, while it will take some time before every >> package with a daemon has the required systemd scripts in place, I think we >> should wait with any switch until there is at least enough coverage. >> >> If you think your comparison is suitable, then are you suggesting we do >> something as difficult as moving from .deb format to .rpm? > [...] >> I'm sure systemd won't be free of problems either. So lets first work on >> getting daemon packages to support systemd, and then see if the result is >> good >> enough to switch to systemd by default. > > That makes no sense, please do some research. systemd supports SysV > init scripts, there's absolutely no need to "wait until packages > support systemd".
Sorry, reading my own post again, I realized you might have meant "let's wait until more packages support systemd so we can be sure it's the right option". That does make sense. I guess we would still need, though, to amend the policy? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANVYNa_9T=0DE_t93YfV=jcc2daqfbgwjxtda_y7aeuvp8f...@mail.gmail.com
