2011/7/18 Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no>: > | The main issue I have with dropping kFreeBSD & HURD would be (apart from > | losing two platforms I use - even if for fun only; I don't want to use a > | distribution that doesn't allow me to have as much fun as I do now) that > | it leads down the path of dropping whatever a vocal upstream decides to > | don't care about. > > Just for the record: Hurd's no longer in unstable and hasn't been for a > while.
I'm confused... I just checked and Hurd is in unstable. Did you mean something else? > I'm not arguing for dropping kfreebsd, and I would like some of the > kFreeBSD porters to speak up with suggestions on how to handle the > situation best for them. After all, it's they who have to live with > whatever solution we end up with. I missed the rest of the discussion, but if the proposal is to replace sysvinit with systemd, that wouldn't force removal of any non-Linux port. It'd be an annoying inconvenient though, as it'd just make it diverge a bit more than it already does. Have you considered InitNG instead? It seems to have similar goals as upstart/systemd without sacrificing portability: http://initng.org/trac -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXNo18etF4Cr3o3b9SS6vq_7=htlzyy6bmgd-qfqfao...@mail.gmail.com
