After receiving some feedback which allowed me to improve the template, this is the message I intend to use for the bug reports:
Package: %package% Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi This package is not installable on kfreebsd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 because it depends unconditionally on fuse-utils. If %package% depends on fuse-utils only to ensure that FUSE support is enabled, please consider adjusting the dependency to something like: Depends: fuse [linux-any] | fuse4bsd [kfreebsd-any] (example uses "fuse" because fuse-utils is now a transitional package that depends on fuse) Else if %package% depends on fuse-utils because it works better when the fusermount command is available, but this is not an essential requirement, please consider lowering it to a recommendation, like: Recommends: fuse (example uses "fuse" because fuse-utils is now a transitional package that depends on fuse) Else if %package% depends on fuse-utils because it can't work at all without fusermount, please reply to this bug report so we can try to find a solution. Thanks! -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxooxrhikif8kvmkingdj6g4g7lqudjo_sd1hx9agnr...@mail.gmail.com
