On Sat, 13 Dec 1997, David Engel wrote: > On Sat, Dec 13, 1997 at 01:06:07AM -0500, Scott K. Ellis wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Dec 1997, Remco Blaakmeer wrote: > > > Would it? What if they would also upgrade their libc5-dev to the same > > > version as the libc5 in hamm? Would that help? In the past these two > > > packages always had to have the same version, AFAIK. > > > > The problem is that libc5-dev doesn't exist in hamm. Hamm has > > libc5-altdev instead. This forces people who want to compile libc5 stuff > > So find someone to modify the libc5 in hamm to build both -dev and > -altdev packages. It isn't that hard.
Trust me, if I thought I was competant enough to do so, I would. However, I don't trust myself not to break such an important package. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
