On Sat, 13 Dec 1997, Remco Blaakmeer wrote: > On Sat, 13 Dec 1997, Scott K. Ellis wrote: > > > This still forces people installing libc6 to upgrade libc5 past a version > > that can be used with libc5-dev. > > Would it? What if they would also upgrade their libc5-dev to the same > version as the libc5 in hamm? Would that help? In the past these two > packages always had to have the same version, AFAIK.
The problem is that libc5-dev doesn't exist in hamm. Hamm has libc5-altdev instead. This forces people who want to compile libc5 stuff into the altgcc/lib*-altdev mode, requiring the mass removal and installation of a whole set of development packages. I'm against forcing people into that just to install "a couple of packages" from hamm. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
