In gmane.linux.debian.devel.general Stefano Zacchiroli <lea...@debian.org> wrote: [...] > In short: if you are maintaining a GNU package [4] in Debian, I'd like > to hear from you. Please mail me comments about your relationship with > GNU as an upstream, whether it is good or bad, and whether you have > specific desiderata that are general enough to be mentioned to GNU as a > project rather than to individual GNU maintainers.
> [4] http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html#allgnupkgs [...] Hello, the only aspect I can think of where there is a real difference to other upstreams is related to the licensing. Besides the obvious (e.g. the push for using the latest GPL/GFDL), the fact that they care about licensing helps. Maintaining GNU software is usually less work, since they care about documenting copyright/license. With other software keeping debian/copyright up to date can be quite time-consuming. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/tnbcd8-141....@argenau.downhill.at.eu.org
