If anybody is trying to get assistance from the upstream community, using fewer idiosyncratic acronyms might help.
And regardless of whether it ever built on MIPS, it clearly should not have given that there isn't a 1.6 Java there. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> wrote: > Seems like it's never built on mips, so an FTBFS on mips isn't RC per > se, it's an important bug. (I think the bug is RC for other reasons > though.) >
