2011/6/5 Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org>: > * Nicolas CANIART <nico...@caniart.net>, 2011-06-05, 12:06: >> >> * Package name : python-sphinx-aafig > > Why such a package name? [...]
Done. > >> * URL : http://pypi.python.org/sphinxcontrib-aafig/ > I think you meant: http://packages.python.org/sphinxcontrib-aafig/ Yep that's the one I put in the control file, sorry. > >> * License : BOLA > > This is not a good license[1]. Please tell upstream to use something sane, > e.g. the Expat license[2]. Asked, but upstream does not seem to agree with Gunnar statements... More over this license was discussed back in 2006 [1,2] on debial-legal and was said dfsg compliant. It is also mentioned in other places like [3], but is not either in the free or non-free list found at [4]. > >> Description : Embedded ASCII art figures in Sphinx documentations > > sphinxcontrib-aafig would depend on aafigure, which is currently orphaned. > Please consider adopting it. > I might, if we can agree on the license problem. And then I am still looking for a sponsor Regards, Nicolas 1: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00098.html 2: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00508.html 3: http://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightNotices 4: http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses 5: http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/index.html (en or fr) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktimqwe+9psxniuxuymyo4totgc0...@mail.gmail.com
