On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdr...@debian.org> wrote: > As a starting point packaging-dev would depend on > > build-essential > quilt > debhelper > cmake > autoconf > cdbs > bzr-builddeb > apt-file > ubuntu-dev-tools (only on Ubuntu systems) > > Do you like the idea or not? Do you have a better name for the meta > package? Should something added to or removed from the dependency list?
This could be useful. A couple of suggestions: Keep vcs specific tools (git-buildpackage, bzr-builddeb, svn-buildpackage) in the Recommends field so they are not hard dependencies. I suppose you don't you don't list devscripts, gnupg, lintian, dput | dupload, and dh-make (there are probably some others) as they are pulled in by other packages. I would explicitly depend on them Recommends on pbuilder | cowbuilder?. -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething> Debian Contributor <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com> PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktinkqssjut8bvfjyr-gk5ddvclg...@mail.gmail.com
