On 03/05/11 at 15:05 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > aptosid is just an example, I don't even know the distro, they may not > be the best choice, I just try to find alternates ideas. Note that I > don't think it takes more than 10 people to do the rolling distro like > Joss propose it: snapshot unstable every month and fix the worst > breakages. It takes more than 10 people to do the same in testing > because each individual fix is tangled in the migration issue, hence > rapidly needs to update things that are at first totally unrelated to be > fixed too first.
By proposing to provide a snapshot every month, you are proposing a different point in the "quality/up-to-date-ness" compromise map. This compromise looks less appealling to me than the "rolling==testing" or the aptosid ones. Also, are you aware of the monthly snapshots built by Michael Gilbert? See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00397.html - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110503131718.ga20...@xanadu.blop.info
