* Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org) [110428 14:55]: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > > So your "testing" is essentially the pre-2000 "frozen" distribution [1], > > > and > > > your "rolling" is basically the current "testing" without the need to > > > freeze? > > > If that's the case, calling the distributions > > > unstable/testing/frozen/stable > > > might make everyone less confused :-) > > > > uh… thanks! that's more clear, indeed. > > Good. I just want to point out that "frozen" built on top on rolling > (which is what we're proposing here) is different from "frozen" built on > top of unstable (which is what we had before the introduction of testing).
The main drawback for frozen was that there is now a suite with quite some bad bugs which need to be fixed. And that we're lacking man power to fix that independend from unstable. I don't see the large difference. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110429212452.gi15...@mails.so.argh.org
