On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:01 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 28/04/2011 11:48, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 at 11:29:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > >> - at freeze time, instead of freezing rolling, we make a snapshot of > >> rolling (I call it testing) and this is where we do the work left > >> to make it ready for release > > > > So your "testing" is essentially the pre-2000 "frozen" distribution [1], and > > your "rolling" is basically the current "testing" without the need to > > freeze? > > If that's the case, calling the distributions unstable/testing/frozen/stable > > might make everyone less confused :-) > > > > uh… thanks! that's more clear, indeed.
I find this terminology clearer, backward compatible, so +1 Giving a new sense to an already used terminology will always cause misunderstood especially on large groups like DD and DU. Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
