On 29/04/11 at 10:23 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > 2. In the past there used to be two rather opposites use-cases of testing: > some (luckely more than just the release team) see it as a tool to develop > stable. Others see it (mostly) as a usable distribution. > I'm unconvinced that splitting testing into rolling+testing will benefit both > use cases. (And I think this is shared rather widely in this thread.)
I think that the proposal is to: - rename 'testing' to 'rolling' to make it clear that it's usable as a rolling release - add a new 'frozen' suite, used only during freezes, to prepare the next stable release So, it's not splitting testing into rolling+testing. It's changing testing to rolling outside of freezes, and splitting testing into rolling+frozen during freezes. - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110429084630.ga9...@xanadu.blop.info
