On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:29:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 05 avril 2011 à 02:08 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit : > > Well, that is not the question of how many, that is the question of > > can you do a given task or not with a given tool. NM is limited in all > > possible ways I can imagine, and also buggy. On the contrary, with > > ifupdown, one for sure can do things that I even cannot imagine due to > > my limited knowledge. > > Your limited knowledge is like jam. The less you have, the more you > spread it.
Thanks, I also love how you show your bitching side on this mailing list when you have no better arguments. > What you actually like about ifupdown is that it cannot do anything but > extremely trivial setups. No, you are wrong. > Then you can stack all soft of stuff on top of it, and get them to > work manually for your specific setup, and since it’s not event-based > you have to hard-code the way your network is set up. I am just following the best practices that are currently available. -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110406165218.GA5910@kaiba.homelan
