On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:17:59PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Stanislav Maslovski, > > Am 2011-04-04 01:11:15, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:26:20PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > May I suggest that you install a squeeze system with the desktop task, > > > with a simple DHCP network configuration? > > Why on earth would I do that? It does not match my needs at all. For > > instance, this laptop sometimes connects to a couple of remote LANs > > through VPNs, so that I have to set up routing in a not completely > > trivial manner. On another site where I sometimes work, there is an > > IPX network to which I have to connect to access the fileserver. > > Occasionaly, I have to run another OS in a virtual machine on this > > laptop for which I set up a bridge, etc. > > And HOW MANY users have such special case? I have in Strasburg and its > Region 37 customers and do not need such killer config.
Well, that is not the question of how many, that is the question of can you do a given task or not with a given tool. NM is limited in all possible ways I can imagine, and also buggy. On the contrary, with ifupdown, one for sure can do things that I even cannot imagine due to my limited knowledge. Feel the difference ;) -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404220829.GA9539@kaiba.homelan
