Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> writes:
> ]] Julien Cristau
>
> | On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:20:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> |
> | > Given that Fedora are adopting /run, and it has been something
> | > we have wanted in the past, is anyone working on implementing
> | > /run in Debian?
> | >
> | > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/146976
>
> Incidentially, I just sent a mail proposing this as a release goal.
>
> | That seems to say "on Debian /lib/init/rw was introduced for the same
> | thing, but I'm using a different name just because I can". What am I
> | missing?
>
> It's a bit of an abuse of the /lib namespace. It also outlines a plan
> for how to get rid of /var/run and /var/lock long-term, something I
> don't believe /lib/init/rw ever tried to. It was just somewhere to
> stuff random early data.
What subdirs will we have then?
/run/run (formerly /var/run)
/run/init (formerly /lib/init/rw)
/run/lock (formerly /var/lock)
or will one of the formerlies become the /run and the other subdirs. or
will /var/run and /lib/init/rw be merged into just /run and /run/lock
for locks?
Depending on that upgrade options change so we should nail that down
first.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87lizws618.fsf@frosties.localnet
