>> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional >> control field: Built-Using. > First of all, thanks very much for taking care of it, that probably > will get us going.
> I just would like to point out that current design solves half of > the problem (being GPL compliant), No, it solves all of the problem, cos .... > but it does not solve code duplication in the archive, this is a different thing entirely. B-U is solely mean of ensuring to do what the licenses want us to do. Getting sanity into packages providing source around and duplication is different to that. -- bye, Joerg [Talking about Social Contract]: We will not discriminate noone[...] [So we discriminate anyone?] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877hbrxn3b....@delenn.ganneff.de
