On 22.03.2011 14:20, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-03-22, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote:
>>> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional
>                              ^^^^^^
>>> control field: Built-Using.
> [...]
>> that would be too strict for e.g. gcj-4.5
>> Built-Using: gcc-4.5 (>= 4.5.2-1~), gcc-4.5 (<< 4.5.3)
>> would be correct, however this already can be expressed in the build
>> dependencies, so I assume packages like gcj-4.x, gdc-4.x, gnat-4.x don't 
>> need to
>> be changed.
> 
> They'd need to *generate* them in the *binary* packages.  So you "just" 
> declare
> the one that was installed at the time of building and you're set.

no, they are not needed at all for these packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d88a515.2040...@debian.org

Reply via email to