On Vi, 04 mar 11, 11:32:01, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > The reason is not that obvious but might be clear when looking to the > image, systems have in the world: > Windows: Insecure, full control, many software, games, official support > Mac: Easy, colorful, all is moving and wabbering > Debian: Secure, clear dependencies, no hidden control (that would > overwrite administrator settings), absolute control > Ubuntu: Colorful, Easy, more or less secure > SuSI^HE: Much of hidden control, insecure (somewhat, but who cares), > YaST > Redhat: Official supported, not that many packages
I thought Debian was "The Universal Operating System" ;), so I would rather divide like this: GNOME/KDE system: lots of functionality out-of-the-box XFCE/LXDE system: decent functionality, usable also on older machines WM/console system: packages only installed as needed I expect a *typical* user of the first two categories to appreciate the functionality provided by zeroconf. If they know what it is they will also be capable of getting rid of it if they so desire, it's not that difficult even with Gnome where the main meta-package directly depends on avahi-daemon. Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
