Yaroslav Halchenko <deb...@onerussian.com> writes: > please do not slap me too hard (only so that I feel your warm carrying > touch): > > is there a rationale for: on amd64 Debian systems having > > /lib64 -> /lib > /usr/lib64 -> /usr/lib > > but no similar one for /usr/local/lib64, so that directory > /usr/local/lib64 gets created if anyone (with enough rights) does 'make > install' pointing there; and we do not include /usr/local/lib64 into ldconfig > path (by default), so those libraries 'get lost' > > aren't we diverging from FHS: > > If directories /lib<qual> or /usr/lib<qual> exist, the equivalent directories > must also exist in /usr/local. > > ?
No reason and yes. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ipx0tacz.fsf@frosties.localnet