On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 15:33, Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 07:01:29PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> >From a reportbug POV, it's not a big deal to redirect the reports for >> bpo packages to something different than sub...@b.d.o. What I need to >> know is: >> >> - the address where to send the bugs >> - a regular expression (bonus points if already in python format) to >> precisely identify bpo packages from the package version >> - if we need to implement it (oh, did I mention that a patch would be >> awesome?) :) > > No, you didn't, but I kinda guessed so :-) > > As we're in deep freeze now, it's time to take a decision on that and > I'd say that it's essentially Don's call. If nothing happens, we can > keep as a fallback solution that of using Send-To, to be eventually > advertised in backport rules for Squeeze, setting the submit@ as an > alias for the mailing list.
Just a note that using Send-To requires to add a bug control file to each upload to bpo which I consider a huge overkill solution to that. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=htoae23nmy2dhajfj-hxq9rsnyzliwxf0j...@mail.gmail.com
