On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > From what concerns the BTS, Don's proposal in [2] (the main one, not > the alternative solution) seems reasonable to me and others in the > thread. The proposal also seems to assume a different Maintainer > field for the bpo package, as hinted above, am I wrong Don?
Right. The idea here is that there will be an additional recipient for bugs which affect the version present in bpo; in the case where the bug is bpo only, headers in the message will allow maintainers to filter out these bugs in mail and the bug listings. [Possibly even by default, but the opt-in mechanism is harder than the default-in to implement.] Don Armstrong -- Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing, after they have exhausted all other possibilities. -- W. Churchill http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100922201919.gc6...@teltox.donarmstrong.com
