On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:54:31AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:35:16AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I intended to upload this package to experimental, but just forgot to
> > change the target distribution. Is there any other chance to change
> > this rather than uploading a
> >
> > gnumed-client (1:0.7.9-1) unstable;
> > gnumed-client (0.8.1-1) experimental;
>
> If I understand the context well, 0.7.9-1 is supposed to fix a major bug,
> while 0.8.1-1 is the next upstream release, probably without any known
> stability problems but not tested well enough yet, and thus meant for
> wheezy -- am I right?
>
> If that is the case, what about using testing-proposed-updates? It is there
> for exactly this purpose.
As far as *I* and *upstream* do see the things, yes this is the correct
interpretation. However, the definition of "major bug" is in an area we
did not dealt with before (see [1]). So I expect a possibly longish
discussion and would have sorted out my own mistake independently from
this.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/09/msg00203.html
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100909100409.gb4...@an3as.eu
