On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:45:04PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Of course,.. but only because your /usr is on the root-fs.
>
> And there are many good reasons to put it on its own fs, as already
> outlayed here...
[...]
No disagreement there... I'm much in favor of continuing to support
/usr on its own filesystem for a variety of reasons. And I
acknowledge the circularity of the argument was only partial (I did
qualify that by calling it *somewhat* circular). My point was that,
playing devil's advocate, it's not enough to suggest that lacking
the tools/logic in the initrd to mount an encrypted /usr is reason
alone to have /usr separate from the / filesystem.
--
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); PGP(97AE496FC02DEC9FC353B2E748F9961143495829);
SMTP(fu...@yuggoth.org); IRC(fu...@irc.yuggoth.org#ccl); ICQ(114362511);
AIM(dreadazathoth); YAHOO(crawlingchaoslabs); FINGER(fu...@yuggoth.org);
MUD(kin...@katarsis.mudpy.org:6669); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); }
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100821225548.gf2...@yuggoth.org
