Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Ponomarenko <susa...@ispras.ru> > wrote: > >> Suggestions for libraries inclusion and feature/bug requests are very >> welcome. Thanks! > > I'd suggest looking at each library in Debian and seeing which > libraries you are missing that have very high numbers of reverse > dependencies and which have very high numbers of recursive reverse > dependencies. You could also search the BTS for bugs about ABI issues > and include any libraries affected by those.
Ideally, why not include every single library in Debian? Some months ago I saw Andrey's announcement[1] of the API sanity check tool in Gentoo's QA mailing list and started working on it in an attempt to check every library in Debian. I didn't go far with it, but it was mostly a matter of lack of time. "Upstream Tracker" is more complete and we should really try to use it and integrate it in our processes. I don't know what's the capacity and support for the idea of checking all of Debian's libraries that the Linux Verification Center is willing to give, but I'm sure we could find a .d.o machine to host a copy of the tool if needed. [1]http://mid.gmane.org/4b7ad30b.8040...@ispras.ru Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c47d91b.5429e70a.54c2.1...@mx.google.com
