On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:13:11PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > So while raising Boost will "solve" the issue, it seems to me to be > a recipe for runaway priority inflation. > > Is there any central authority to vet priority changes?
Indeed, I think this needs wider attention, next to the apt-get-vs.-aptitude discussion. I believe additional Depends on important packages should get proposed on -devel first, so that people can comment on them and possibly propose alternatives etc. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100718132042.ga17...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
