On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 14:00 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jun 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 13:39 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > > On 07/06/2010 17:37, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > > > But for a kernel install or reconfigure, it is the responsibility of the
> > > > kernel maintainer scripts to invoke the bootloader.  See also, for 
> > > > example,
> > > > linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390.postinst, where zipl is assigned as the 
> > > > bootloader
> > > > on line 38.  This really is an "open and shut case", if only I can the 
> > > > kernel
> > > > people to actually look at it!  Please look at it!
> > > 
> > > If I recall correctly, kernel maintainers have introduced
> > > /etc/kernel/post{inst,rm}.d/ in order to avoid to hardcode each possible
> > > bootloader in their script.
> > > Can't lilo provide a script here ?
> > 
> > It could, but that should be redundant in squeeze since update-initramfs
> > already runs lilo.
> 
> Not every kernel package needs an initrd.

But those that don't, invoke lilo (or other bootloader) directly.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to