On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 14:00 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Tue, 08 Jun 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 13:39 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > > > On 07/06/2010 17:37, Stephen Powell wrote: > > > > But for a kernel install or reconfigure, it is the responsibility of the > > > > kernel maintainer scripts to invoke the bootloader. See also, for > > > > example, > > > > linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390.postinst, where zipl is assigned as the > > > > bootloader > > > > on line 38. This really is an "open and shut case", if only I can the > > > > kernel > > > > people to actually look at it! Please look at it! > > > > > > If I recall correctly, kernel maintainers have introduced > > > /etc/kernel/post{inst,rm}.d/ in order to avoid to hardcode each possible > > > bootloader in their script. > > > Can't lilo provide a script here ? > > > > It could, but that should be redundant in squeeze since update-initramfs > > already runs lilo. > > Not every kernel package needs an initrd.
But those that don't, invoke lilo (or other bootloader) directly. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part