On dim., 2010-05-30 at 20:46 +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > Not a 100% sync, since any conflicts will need to be resolved, but quite > good for systems with sparse users. Also for reinstalling/replacing > systems, because it makes the IDs independent from the order in which > they were created.
I'm sure you could do a wrapper around adduser to specify the UID has a hash of the username (or something, so you would have the same uid on all your boxes), though it might be hard to avoid collisions in the short allowed range. Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
