On 26/05/10 08:07, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 25/05/10 at 23:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: >> 124 source packages. Bad, but not as crazy as 1,540. >> >> (I've heard of off-by-one errors but off-by-one-order-of-magnitude is a >> stretch.) > > No. 124 is the number of packages that failed to build. Not the number > of source packages that silently generated incorrect binary packages.
Right. That's exactly why I suggested debdiffing the resulting binary packages from a new and an old dash. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
