On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 07:10:14PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > As far as I understood,... you guys are already starting to patch > unrelated software just to make UPG work (see > #581919). > > Even the title of that "bug", "bad ownership or modes..." is > ridiculous... and proves what I've predicted before, namely that these > changes will compromise security (such a patch will also affect non UPG > systems).
Reading the discussion in #314347, it looks like permission checks will only get relaxed on UPG systems, which sounds sane to me. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100517180843.gc3...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
