Felipe Sateler <fsate...@gmail.com> writes: > On 16/05/10 16:50, Harald Braumann wrote:
>> If non-UPG systems should be supported, keep the umask at 022 and let >> the admin edit a single line to change it, if this is needed and he >> knows it's a pure UPG system. > Is there a reason to support non-UPG systems? Yes. Many Debian users already have non-UPG systems and are not going to change their enterprise-wide account provisioning in order to accomodate UPG. Remember, the decision to use UPG in many environments is not a per-system decision. If the users are coming from some external source like LDAP, it's an enterprise-wide decision and the person installing Debian may not have any choice in the matter. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iq6ne7lm....@windlord.stanford.edu
