On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:14:00 -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote: > I guess I'm more or less curious why we're still using this outdated > umask value with UPG. What would it take for Debian to update our > default umask to match the UPG scheme? Is this doable for Sqeeze? Are > there reasons for not making the switch? > Are there reasons for making the switch? With user groups, umask 002 or 022 doesn't make a difference. To switch off user groups, you set USERGROUPS=no in adduser.conf, and that's it.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
