On Sat, 8 May 2010 11:51:22 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> wrote: >On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 11:37:10AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: >> So it is the classical desktop vs. server situation. For my Debian >> servers, that get booted at most once a month, I don't give a damn >> about a faster boot. >> >> I _do_ care, however, about not having migrations in the boot process >> which has the potential of breaking a system reboot, possibly making >> it necessary to obtain a means to access the console in case of >> breakage. > >Sure, but I don't think that the server argument should be use to imply >that no changes, that benefit some of our users, are allowed at all.
No, but it is valid to avoid a migration of this magnitude weeks before the freeze, with the next migration to the next new mechanism already on the horizon. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ob4ea-0005fh...@swivel.zugschlus.de
