On Fri, 7 May 2010 19:27:54 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> wrote: >On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:15:24PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Fri, 7 May 2010 09:26:18 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> >> wrote: >> >The init.d world has changed quite a bit in recent years and might >> >change even more in the next, it is possible that for Squeeze+1 we'll >> >want to be elsewhere than at CONCURRENCY=makefile. >> >> If we want to be elsewhere for squeeze+1, why do we need to do a >> critical migration twice? > >(Beside the nitpick on "we want" vs "we possibly want") I'd argue that >it's because we want a faster boot from our users ASAP.
So it is the classical desktop vs. server situation. For my Debian servers, that get booted at most once a month, I don't give a damn about a faster boot. I _do_ care, however, about not having migrations in the boot process which has the potential of breaking a system reboot, possibly making it necessary to obtain a means to access the console in case of breakage. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oagt8-0006uo...@swivel.zugschlus.de
