On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:04:58 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > can you list the benefits? > · Consistency. I like to find packages with a name I would expect. > Charles Plessy [2] and Philipp Kern [3] seem to agree with this.
Count me in. A consistent schema is easier for searching, for downloading (source|binary) package, for finding a package's bugs or PTS page, for "blindly" adding dependencies ... > > if, then a wishlist would be better. there are still functional bugs > > [1] that need a people having some free time... > I'm fine with that priority as well. It is not really urgent after all. I agree that fixing "real" (especially RC) bugs is more important but nevertheless I'm in favour of filing bugs asking for a renaming of the packages in question. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Peter Jones: Belle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
