[Thorsten Glaser] > JFTR, Clint Adams and I have been working to get posh up to the task > of being a /bin/sh as well, so any solution should be able to not > only have GNU bash and dash and mksh as /bin/sh but also, > eventually, posh and ksh93 (if they add an “alias local=typeset” > builtin at least).
Using dash as /bin/sh was introduced to solve some specific problems. Which unsolved problems would using these other shells as /bin/sh solve that is not solved already by using dash? I am not aware of any such problems, and unless some problem can be solved by replacing /bin/sh by for example posh and ksh93, I see no reason to increase the complexity of the solution selected to handle /bin/sh to cater for those that want to do this. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2fliq8p5zxy....@login1.uio.no