On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 01:25:44AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > I don't think that just because something is required, it should be > > necessarily part of dpkg. So far, we are talking about a policy of > > including md5sum in our .debs, *not* about changing the .deb format to > > require md5sums (at least, as far as I can tell). > > Yes we do. If not having a md5sum (or rather sha256sum) file in the > package is a policy violation of a MUST directive then the .deb format > is effectively changed.
No, it is not. Debian is not only consumer of the .deb format these days. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100307105032.ga19...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org