On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 09:11:21AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > FWIW, about the people proposing to change from md5 to something else, > it should be pretty easy to achieve too: if all of us is using > dh_md5sums,
Which is not the case. There are still people who like to package without helpers. > it would be enough to change its implementation to store a > different kind of checksums (the name will become pretty bogus, though). Maybe that would be a good starting point to give it a more common name although this would require somewhat more work ;) Regards, Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100304082704.ga20...@lisa
