On 13/02/10 at 21:09 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > But we are constantly wondering where we should go from there. Should we > > add more data (like the RC bugs in stable and the unfixed security > > issues)? Or should we instead try to decrease the amount of data (to > > increase the signal/noise ratio), for example by not reporting about > > Lintian errors and warnings? > > One thing that would be nice, but that is not directly related to DDPO > messages or the PTS, though it's always when i receive the DDPO mail > that i think about it, would be to allow upstream version tracking of > branches. > > For example, right now, for iceweasel, version 3.6 is reported as the > last version, which is nice, but i'd also like to be able to get a > report when 3.5.8 is going to be released, though i'd also like to keep > the current tracking for the 3.6 versions.
Isn't that just a problem of writing your debian/watch in a way that picks up 3.5.8 but not 3.6.X? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100214135745.ga11...@xanadu.blop.info
