On 13/02/10 at 21:21 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > It would be nice to have a web version of it so that I can quickly check > that I did not miss something important. It could also be useful in MIA/QA > to see how many problems someone has left accumulating.
On 14/02/10 at 08:56 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I'd like to echo buxy's suggestion about a web-based version, which > would satisfy #461898. I don't think that we should add another "view". We already have the PTS (package-centric), DDPO (maintainer/team-centric) and PET (maintainer/team-centric, with a focus on VCS). Adding more ways to provide about the same information increases the risk of missing some information. However, what could be done is to rewrite DDPO in a more "modern" way, leveraging UDD (as DDPO-by-mail does). Since almost all the data is already in UDD, it's mainly a matter of doing the web frontend, and it would then be possible, if properly designed, to provide both a "general listing" view (like the current DDPO), and a TODO list. That would be a nice Debcamp project. > RC bugs in stable would be nice if we can get a way to tag them > "wontfix-in-stable". Because not all RC bugs affecting stable will > be fixed by stable updates and they should not clutter this report > indefinitely. (I know we can tag the bug "sid squeeze" to indicate > that the bug only applies to those distributions but that's not what I'm > saying above) That might indeed be a nice addition. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100214140942.gb11...@xanadu.blop.info
