> I need pthsem, so I only want a working version with all features I > need.
All I care about is that there is an agreement between the Debian community and the upstream developer. Martin is very active in supporting his environment and in that respect I am to inclined to support his decision. Can we conclude that pthsem is a valid branch, worth a seperate package? An alternative for Martin is probably to include/hide pthsem in bcusdk; but that would not be as clean IMHO (ffmpeg anyone?) -- greetz, marc Radioactive cats have 18 half-lives. crichton 2.6.26 #1 PREEMPT Tue Jul 29 21:17:59 CDT 2008 GNU/Linux
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
